Aside from the obvious, that the video shows a prototype unit.
I was curious myself and have been doing a little research on the matter and here are my findings:
I’m basing my conclusions mostly on close inspection of the unit featured in the Kickstarter video and subsequently covered on this Engadget article.
Design:
There are a few mostly minor differences in the Hexy design, nothing that I would consider an issue.
Servos:
In a previous post, I noted the prototype uses Hextronik XHT900 servos whose dimensions look to be a dead-match for the Tower Pros.
In this post, roboalchemist confirms the fit but notes that the servos included in the kit are custom-made and include more durable gears.
In other words, the servos are, for all intents, the same.
Servo Controller Board:
This is where the big difference lies…
As the following images (courtesy of Engadget) show, the controller board on the prototype is not an Arctronics Servotor32 board, but rather a Lynxmotion SSC-32 controller.
This board is pretty tried-and-true and used in plenty of other Hexapod robots, usually in conjunction with a separate board (eg. BotBoarduino, Arduino Mega, etc.) to handle the Inverse Kinematics and “talk” to a remote controller, such as a PS2 game controller.

For reference, here’s another view of the SSC-32:

I suspect that the poor performance we’re seeing is due to the Arduino-based firmware on the board. This firmware looks pretty basic at the moment and may not be as efficient as it could be.
I don’t think this is any reason for alarm and am hopeful that the next few firmware updates will help alleviate the bigger issues. According to a separate forum post, the first of these updates is slated for a Christmas-time release,