My Sparki issues - and why they don't bother me

Yes, my Sparki has a few issues with the servo and orienting the ultrasonic sensor (more likely some sort of a software issue), and not having the original example file that the unit shipped with to load back on (which worked) put a damper on the Sunday I was going to work with my son on it. I won’t really be able to dive into it until some of these things get addressed somehow.

BUT… it needs to be said that I can totally see the potential in this thing. All of the sensors, the durable packaging, the easy and obvious expandability, and the way you can totally tell that, someday soon, it will lead to an incredible array of creative play.

There are just some issues that need to be ironed out.

I saw some pretty nasty fighting on our customer end (not from Arcbotics - they’ve been completely professional in their responses), and just wanted to put in my two cents that there hasn’t been enough of a chance given to Arcbotics to iron out the issues. The product has only been out a few days, and Arcbotics is not a huge company.

I have no problem in investing in potential. Sure - it’s not ready to sell at Walmart, but this is so much easier than most of the newbie kits out there - it is a huge step in the right direction. Even for someone like me who can’t really code… I would so much rather have a Sparki, than some neutered idiot proof little bot that only does what it was designed to do, or the opposite extreme - a box full of parts you need a soldering iron and 9 months of research and iterative design for before it does anything.

Thank you Arcbotics, for giving people a tool we can make useful and educational. For my 10 year old son and I, it is our first step into robotics. I’m looking forward to what you made possible for such a reasonable price. It’s risky that you don’t have a huge staff to do the inevitable tech support marketing to this specific audience will bring, but it was worth doing. Your business model will work.

Hear, hear!

Most of the software issues will resolve over time. I see the Sparki as a common hardware platform
and I think the community should be making the software fixes and improvements. As long as the hardware stays the same this modell will work. If the hardware changes between revisions of the Sparki I think the community will loose interest of maintaing the software and the whole point will be lost. At least as I see it.

Salut,

I must admit, that my expectations towards the sparki were too high and therefore I was very disappointed when I started using the robot. Now I have spent more time in looking at the code and it is not feature complete and therefore I consider is alpha state. This is not meant as a criticism but as a statement about its state it is in.

I agree with the opinion mentioned above that there is a lot of potential and the only hardware issue I have found so far is that I miss to move things up with the gripper, so that would be something for a sparki2.

I will spend time on testing and fixing code on this robot because I want this to become a useful project. My first anger is gone anyway and I make progress.

So - lets give them a bit of credit and be happy on every single item that starts to work properly. There are kickstarter projects which ave been much, much worse (i.e. smartduino) and much better (i.e. gameduino2). We can move sparki to become one of the better projects

Ciao, Mathias

Hear, hear! I agree. In addition, I’d also like to point out one other thing. I also own a couple of Arduino boards (with LCD addons) and several of the minor issues that people have pointed out are not issues with Sparki, but with the Arduino boards themselves. I get screen artifacts on my other LCDs that are connected to Arduinos, and I sometimes have to reset them a couple of times in order to get code to upload and execute properly. These are just a couple of examples, based on some feedback that has been posted to the forums.

Regardless, Sparki is a very good starting point. I could also see a Sparki v2.0, with an updated Arduino board that doesn’t have these minor issues. I’m sure there are other Arduino programmers on here that will confirm this…

PS. Wishlist: It would be nice if v2.0 had wireless 802.11 capabilities! :wink:

I agree that the product is viable to be come a great one. For SparkiV2, hopefully we can just upgrade the main board without having to buy a whole new Sparki, unless all the other hardware components are overhauled.

A kingdom for wireless code loading.